What Is Kashmir

The disagreement, first

No table on this page matters as much as this one. It is the same year, the same territory, and the same paragraph of the same UN report.[1]

Conflict deaths in Jammu & Kashmir, 2018 — two counts
Counted byCiviliansMilitantsSecurity forcesTotal
JKCCS
Kashmiri civil society
~160267159586
Ministry of Home Affairs
Government of India, to 2 Dec 2018
3723886not stated
Difference on civilians~4.3×1.1×1.8×

Every figure on this site

FigureWhat it countsSourceDateLimits
70,000+People killed since 1989 — the count kept by Kashmiri civil societyIPTK + APDP, Alleged Perpetrators, and Kashmiri civil society generallyDec 2012 onwardStated by IPTK as “more than 70,000 deaths”. An advocacy figure, named as such, and not sourced within that report’s own passage. Printed because it is the count the people of the territory keep — see the note below the table.
~40,000–47,000The same dead, on the lower totals that circulate in Indian official and media accountsIndian official and media accountsvariousThis site could not trace a single authoritative Government of India total. The absence is itself the finding.
0Independent counts of the dead ever permitted in Jammu and Kashmir1989–2026OHCHR asked for a commission of inquiry in 2018 and for access in 2018 and 2019. Neither India nor Pakistan granted it. This is why the two counts above cannot be reconciled.
1,253People blinded by metal pelletsShri Maharaja Hari Singh Hospital, Srinagar, via UN OHCHRmid-2016 – end 2018Counts those blinded, not those hit. Hospital caseload, so undercounts anyone not treated there.
8,000–10,000Men subjected to enforced disappearanceAPDP — organisation of victims’ familiessince 1990An advocacy organisation’s estimate, not a UN or judicial finding. Establishing a true figure would require the investigation never permitted.
2,730Graves — not bodies — confirmed to existJ&K State Human Rights Commission, via FIDH and JKCCS16 Apr 2011A count of graves. The SHRC recommended forensic examination, DNA testing and a Commission of Inquiry; none was implemented.
574 of 2,156Bodies examined in the SHRC north Kashmir enquiry that were identified — as local KashmirisSHRC enquiry SHRC/PIW/2011/1000, via UN OHCHR 14 Jun 20182 July 2011Buried as unidentified infiltrators; at least 574 were local. A separate finding from the 2,730 graves.
2,080Unidentified persons in graves the SHRC directed be investigated — in Poonch and Rajouri, Jammu divisionSHRC order, recorded in UN OHCHR 14 Jun 201824 Oct 2017A different region and a different year from the north Kashmir enquiry. FIDH and JKCCS record the same order as acknowledging 3,844 graves — Poonch 2,717, Rajouri 1,127.
0Prosecutions of armed forces personnel sanctioned under AFSPAUN OHCHRto 8 July 2019OHCHR’s finding covers ‘nearly three decades’ to July 2019. This site does not assert what happened after that date without a source.
432Torture case studies documentedAPDP + JKCCS20 May 2019Advocacy organisations, named. The most detailed record in existence; not a random sample.
301Of those 432 victims, civiliansAPDP + JKCCS2019The report’s central finding on who torture was used against.
49 (11.3%)Of the 432, died during or after tortureAPDP + JKCCS201940 of the 49 deaths attributed to torture injuries.
222 (51.4%)Of the 432, suffered lasting health problemsAPDP + JKCCS2019209 of them chronic. No compensation received.
29.4%Of the 432, subjected to genital electrocutionAPDP + JKCCS2019Applies to victims of both sexes.
12Of the 24 women among the 432, raped by armed personnelAPDP + JKCCS2019
121Case studies naming the Rashtriya RiflesAPDP + JKCCS2019Most-named regiment, of 288 army-regiment mentions.
500Individual alleged perpetrators identified from 214 casesIPTK + APDP, Alleged PerpetratorsDec 2012Compiled over two years largely from official state documents. 235 army, 123 paramilitary, 111 J&K Police, 31 government-backed militants. Advocacy organisations, named.
2 + 3Major Generals and Brigadiers among the alleged perpetratorsIPTK + APDPDec 2012Plus 9 Colonels, 78 Majors, 25 Captains, 37 senior federal paramilitary officials, a recently retired DGP of J&K Police and a serving Inspector General.
124Extra-judicial killings recorded across those 214 casesIPTK + APDPDec 2012Plus 65 enforced disappearances, 59 instances of torture, 9 rapes. Some cases involve more than one.
96Of the 214 cases, those naming the Rashtriya RiflesIPTK + APDPDec 2012Ahead of BSF (70) and CRPF (34). Independently matches the 2019 torture report’s finding on the same formation.
27Of the 432 cases, those that reached the State Human Rights CommissionAPDP + JKCCS2019Roughly one in sixteen. Reaching a commission is not a prosecution.
~23Women gang-raped at Kunan Poshpora by soldiers of the 4 Rajputana RiflesUN OHCHR 14 Jun 2018, paras. 129–131 — per survivors and the Deputy Commissioner of Kupwara’s official report23 Feb 1991Denied by the Army and the Government of India. Police stopped investigating by Oct 1991, declaring the case ‘untraceable’. No conviction.
at least 53Killed by the BSF at SoporeAmnesty International ASA 20/17/936 Jan 1993Some secondary sources give 43 or 57. Amnesty’s primary case study says at least 53.
at least 47Killed by the CRPF at a funeral procession, SrinagarAmnesty International ASA 20/17/9321 May 1990
13Killed by the BSF at SoporeAmnesty International ASA 20/17/9313 Apr 1992
1,081Civilians killed by security forces in extrajudicial killingsJKCCS, via UN OHCHR2008–2018JKCCS figure; named as such.
213Days with no internet at allInternet Society Pulse; SFLC.in trackerfrom 5 Aug 2019Plus ~550 days of partial or no connectivity. 4G restored 5 Feb 2021.
65 of 134India’s 2018 internet shutdowns that were in J&KCivil society tracker, via UN OHCHR2018Half of all Indian shutdowns were in the Kashmir Valley.
25Internet shutdowns in J&K in four monthsUN OHCHRJan–Apr 2019
74–95%Kashmir Valley respondents who would vote for independence — Baramula 95%, Srinagar 82%, Badgam 75%, Anantnag 74%Chatham House / Bradnock, Kashmir: Paths to PeaceMay 20103,774 face-to-face interviews, both sides of the LoC, Sept–Oct 2009. Quota sampling; 15 years old; no comparable survey permitted since.
2%Respondents across Indian-administered J&K who would vote to join PakistanChatham House / BradnockMay 20106% in Srinagar. Printed on a site argued from a Pakistani perspective because it is what the only serious survey found.
43%Independence support across the whole territory — the most popular single option, but not a territory-wide majorityChatham House / BradnockMay 2010A majority in only four districts, all in the Kashmir Valley; 1% or less in five others; near zero in Jammu Division. The polarisation is the argument for a vote.
96%Srinagar respondents naming unemployment as a main problem facing KashmirChatham House / BradnockMay 201098% Anantnag, 94% Baramula, 87% across J&K. Ranked above corruption (68%) and human rights abuses (43%) by the same people.
>90%Of Pakistan’s crops watered by the Indus system, whose three western rivers flow through contested Jammu and KashmirCSIS2025Also: >75% of Pakistan’s renewable water originates outside its borders, almost entirely from the Indus. India held the 1960 treaty “in abeyance” from April 2025.
45%Adults in the Kashmir Valley with symptoms of significant mental distressMSF + University of Kashmir + IMHANS2015 survey~1.8m adults. Symptom screening (‘probable’), not confirmed clinical diagnosis. 5,600 households.
19%Adults with symptoms of probable PTSDSame survey201541% probable depression; 26% probable anxiety.
~2,800Detained after the Pahalgam attackUN Special Procedures (14 mandate holders)24 Nov 2025Includes journalists and human rights defenders. Held under PSA or UAPA.
~8,000Social media accounts blockedUN Special Procedures24 Nov 2025Includes journalists and independent media outlets.
~1,900Muslims and Rohingya expelled to Bangladesh and MyanmarUN Special Procedures24 Nov 2025Often without due process; identified as a non-refoulement breach.
26Killed at PahalgamUN Special Procedures; HRW World Report 202622 Apr 2025Mostly Hindu tourists. Condemned unequivocally by the UN experts and by this site.
40CRPF personnel killed at PulwamaUN OHCHR14 Feb 2019
29Of 2018’s civilian deaths, caused by Pakistani shelling across the LoCJKCCS, via UN OHCHR2018Printed because the same paragraph is the source for the 71 attributed to Indian forces.
25Books banned; bookshops raidedHuman Rights Watch, World Report 2026Aug 2025Included A Dismantled State by Anuradha Bhasin.
14UN special-procedure mandate holders signing the Kashmir statementUN OHCHR24 Nov 2025All named on the record page.

Figures this site will not print

A data page is defined as much by what it refuses to carry. These are the numbers that circulate widely and are absent here, with the reason.

  • Troop deployment numbers. “Six hundred thousand”, “seven hundred thousand”, “the most militarised place on earth” — all widely repeated, none traceable to a verifiable official or independent count. Deployment figures are not published.
  • Troop numbers. “Six hundred thousand”, “seven hundred thousand”, “the most militarised place on earth” — all widely repeated, none traceable to a verifiable official or independent count. Deployment figures are not published.
  • Kashmiri Pandit displacement and death figures. Genuinely disputed between government records, community organisations and academic studies. This site will not manufacture precision here in either direction. Discussed on Hard Questions.
  • Casualties from the four-day India–Pakistan exchange of 2025. Both governments made claims; neither has been independently verified. Reported as claims, attributed, never as fact.
  • Domicile certificates issued to non-residents, and land transferred. Central to File 11 and deliberately left blank, because no reliable independent figure has been found.

On the death toll, and why this site prints it

An earlier version of this page refused to print any total for the dead, on the grounds that the circulating range was too wide to source. That was the wrong call, and it broke this site’s own rule.

The rule is print both counts and name who counted. That is what this site does for 2018, where JKCCS counted 586 dead and India’s Home Ministry counted a fraction of the civilians. Refusing a figure is not more rigorous than attributing it — it is just silence, and silence about the number of dead is exactly what the people who did the killing would prefer.

So: more than 70,000 is the count kept by Kashmiri civil society and stated by the International People’s Tribunal. Lower totals of roughly 40,000–47,000 circulate in Indian official and media accounts. Both are above. Neither can be verified, because no independent count has ever been permitted — OHCHR asked for a commission of inquiry in 2018 and was refused, and asked for access twice and was refused. The international record →

The gap between 47,000 and 70,000 is twenty-three thousand people. That a dispute of that size can persist for thirty-seven years, unresolved, is not a statistical curiosity. It is the clearest possible argument for the investigation that has never been allowed.

How to check any of this

Take a figure from the table above, open the source document, and search it. The two OHCHR reports are paragraph-numbered and free; the Amnesty reports carry index numbers; the MSF survey publishes its methodology. Direct links to every primary document are in the library.

If a number here does not survive that test, tell us and it will be corrected or removed. That offer is the whole point of the page.

Sources & notes

  1. UN OHCHR, Update of the Situation of Human Rights in Indian-Administered Kashmir and Pakistan-Administered Kashmir from May 2018 to April 2019, 8 July 2019, paras. 7–8.